Thursday, August 4, 2011

Better Choices for Virginia: A Message to Our Legislators

Today marked the public launch of the Better Choices for Virginia Coalition.  The Coalition is “a diverse group of Virginians committed to a stable and prosperous Commonwealth.”  Comprised of 27 Virginia organizations from public advocacy groups to business groups to think-tanks, the coalition is still growing.  For more information on Better Choices for Virginia, visit the website

The Better Choices campaign represents a desire to shift away from a “cuts-only” approach that further throws Virginia off balance without reasonable, thoughtful attempts to increase revenue in order to protect the diverse and numerous Virginians who have been harmed by destructive cuts in spending.  This morning, the Better Choices Coalition held a press conference to launch itself as a power in this conversation. 

Members of the Virginia PTA, The Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis, Henrico County School Division, and Mental Health America of Virginia provided both stories and hard facts in an effort to gain support for the coalition and its purpose of “protecting Virginia’s future prosperity.”  Virginia is at risk of depriving students of quality education, the ill of medication and care, and every Virginian of a long term plan designed to protect against the one-sidedness of a cuts-only approach.  For Michael Cassidy’s editorial calling for a shift in approach that includes balance and new revenue, visit The Virginian-Pilot online.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

The Art of Complaining

The VPLC interns have created a resource list as a part of greater action plan for those dealing with faulty financial products.  This list is designed to provide consumers with the tools needed to lodge a complaint to the proper authorities.  The word “complaint” can have negative connotations, creating images of whining, nagging, and pestering, but issuing a complaint can be highly productive.  For those recovering from the negative effects of damaging financial services and products, it can be a tough ask to go on record with private issues and introduce them to the public forum.  But, one person’s complaint is almost definitely shared by others, and the more information that consumers have, the better.  The list offers advice on a range of actions from disputing a credit report to lodging a complaint with a government agency to telling one's story to increase awareness.  The how-to list can be found below.   

Issuing a Complaint to the Bureau of Financial Institutions (BFI)
Information on filing a complaint can be found at the SCC’s website at http://www.scc.virginia.gov/bfi/complain.aspx and to file complaints directed to the BFI visit  http://www.scc.virginia.gov/bfi/files/complaint_info.pdf for guidelines on submitting a written complaint. To check up on your complaint or make an additional inquiry, call 1-800-552-7945 (VA only.)

Issuing a Complaint to the Office of Consumer Affairs  
Issuing a complaint to the Office of Consumer Affairs can be done online at http://www.vdacs.virginia.gov/consumers/cgi-bin/complaints.cgi. There you will be directed to fill out a form with the subject matter of your complaint.  You will then be given the information (telephone number, mailing address etc.) of the organization that will field your complaint.  You may also call the hotline at the Office of Consumer Affairs at 1-800-552-9963.

Issuing a Complaint to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
To issue a complaint with the CFPB in regards to foreclosures, home loans, mortgages, credit cards, student loans, land purchases or rentals from a developer, deposit accounts, other financial products or services, or even non financial products or services, visit the CFPB’s complaints portion of its site at http://www.consumerfinance.gov/get-help-now/consumer-questions-and-complaints/. To tell your story to this federal watchdog, fill in the tab at https://help.consumerfinance.gov/app/tellyourstory. Note that this is not a complaint form.

Disputing a Credit Report
To dispute a credit report, you must send a dispute letter.  For more information on where and how to send a dispute, visit http://myfaircredit.com/s/correcting-your-credit. For additional help and a sample dispute letter, visit http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre21.shtm.

Internet Crimes
If you believe you have been the victim of internet fraud, go to http://www.ic3.gov to issue a complaint online.  Fill out the online form on the home page of the site.

Protecting Consumers by Giving Them a Choice

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is up and running.  A refreshing change from some government activities, the CFPB is not operating independently of the desires of consumers.  The CFPB has launched a portion of its website that allows consumers to vote on the best simplified disclosure form.  Click here to vote on your favorite form using an example loan product.  

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Alternative Financial Services should hire Clint Eastwood as a spokesman.  Talk about the good, the bad and the ugly.  Because the banking sector will not issue loans to high risk applicants, room in the market has been made for alternative financial services.  It makes sense to offer short-term, high(er) interest rate loans to those who may not be able to pay off larger long-term loans due to the demand.  When dealing with predatory lending, the good can be hard to find, but it is important to note that the market has made way for these services. 

Where’s the bad?  The interest rates are incredibly high on many of these loans.  Even though payday loans are regulated at 36% APR, adding all the additional fees to the interest rate payments results in loan payments rivaling those of a 300% APR loan.  Also, supply and demand take on a different form with certain alternative financial services.  They perpetuate their own demand.  Not unlike a drug dealer, a payday lender sells a product knowing the client will come back for more.  If the borrower needs the money now, he or she will surely need money later to pay off the loan. 

Was that the ugly?  Almost.  Not only do these companies back borrowers even further against the ropes, but they are not honest in doing so.  The real ugliness is the deceit.  Lies of omission, rushing through the paper work, and intentionally clouding over the details are tactics used by payday and car title lenders to ensure the issuing of a high interest, fee-riddled loan to a borrower that has the potential to keep making this industry money.  To see the real effect of lies and poor communication, read Tasha Kate’s article in The Daily Progress about a recent law suit against Allied Cash Advance for violating the Truth in Lending Act.

Consumers are both responsible for themselves and in need of protection from predatory practices.  Consumers should be allowed to make their own financial decisions, but the paper work and employees that they deal with should be held to standards of clarity.  Contracts should be easy to navigate, short, and the all fees should be explicitly stated in one spot.  Lenders should be held to a code of ethics, and communications within a company should be better as to avoid wrongful foreclosure or repossession.

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Robo-Signing Rampant in Virginia Mortgage Documents

Last week 8 News Investigates aired a two-part segment (Part I and Part II) uncovering Virginia mortgage documents that contain fraudulent signatures. Signatures of known robo-signer Linda Green were found on document after document. According to local attorney Tom Domonoske, these fraudulent documents can cause big problems, especially when homeowners are trying obtain title insurance.

In response to the Channel 8 News report, VPLC interns went down to the Richmond Circuit Court to look for more fraudulent documents. Not only were there many more documents containing Linda Green's signature, but also of other known robo-signers including Jeffrey Stephan and Bethany Hood. Many of the signatures have various forms indicating that numerous people were signing the same name.

When asked if the banks behind the fraud should be held accountable, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli said "absolutely, absolutely, and we're intent on doing that."

Hopefully there will be accountability for robo-signing. In an article this week by the Associated Press, Senator Sherrod Brown said "Wall Street and some in Washington want us to believe that robo-signing is a thing of the past, but the same risky practices that put our economy on the brink of collapse continue to infect the housing market." Senator Brown, the chair of the Financial Institutions and Consumer Protection Subcommittee said that the subcommittee will hold a hearing on the robo-signing issue.

Additionally, the attorneys general in Minnesota, Massachusetts and Illinois have reported that they are looking into the extent of robo-signing in their states.

Monday, July 18, 2011

Getting the CFPB off its Feet

     The highly partisan struggle surrounding the creation and opening of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on this coming Thursday has taken another turn as Obama announces his nominee for director.  Richard Cordray, the current head of the enforcement division of the CFPB and former Attorney General of Ohio, has been named by Obama to vie for the position instead of Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard Law Professor responsible for the creation of the bureau.  For insight into Obama’s decision and Republican opposition, click here for Appelbaum's article from the New York Times.    
     To see what consumers are asking of the CFPB, check out Ron Lieber’s July 16th article, “Consumer Watchdog is All Ears for Ideas.”  As mentioned in an earlier post on this blog, it remains hugely important to voice your opinions to the new watchdog created to protect you as a consumer.  

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

NBC 12 On Your Side Alert: Online Loans

On Friday, NBC 12 aired a segment discussing predatory online loans in Virginia. VaPERL's coordinator, Dana Wiggins was featured along with the hotline that consumers can call for assistance. Hopefully more consumers will have gotten the word that online loans are illegal and unenforceable. If you know anyone who is willing to share their story, let us know because there are reporters willing to follow predatory lending.

To see the story, click here.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

New Hampshire Vetoes Bill Legalizing Excessive Interest Rates

Sharkie would be proud of New Hampshire for holding strong against the predatory lending lobby. This week Governor Lynch vetoed a bill that would have allowed for interest rate caps of 25% per month. New Hampshire currently caps interest rates on car title loans at 36% APR. In the Governor's veto message, he recognizes that car title loans with 300% ARP interest rates would be detrimental to families, communities and the economy. Hear, hear!

View the whole press release here.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

The Face of Responsible Lending in Virginia

Reformed loan shark, Sharkie, is a staunch supporter of responsible lending in Virginia.  To meet Sharkie and learn more about his mission, visit his Facebook page.  Sharkie has teamed up with the Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy and the VPLC to send out pledge cards to the candidates running for the Virginia State Legislature.  The pledge cards inform the candidates and offer them the opportunity to publicly commit to supporting a fee-inclusive 36% annual interest rate cap for lenders.  


Friday, July 1, 2011

Outreach Update

To date, VPLC interns have supplied informational materials to two Richmond Public Libraries (Main and Westover Hills,) the WIC Office, YMCA Daycare, J Sergeant Reynolds, the VCU financial aid office, the Goodwill office, Housing Opportunities Made Equal, the Richmond Outreach Center, HillTop Promises, and the 3rd Street Deli.

Lobbying 101 from Delegate Jennifer McClellan

Yesterday, Delegate Jennifer McClellan of the 71st House District met at the Housing Opportunities Made Equal (HOME) building in Downtown Richmond for a Community Conversation on Housing.  After a few “housing snapshots” from members of HOME, the conversation turned to how to pass housing legislation.  

The take-home message from McClellan was to act early and find the middle ground.  She encouraged public advocates to start talking to delegates and senators in the summer because those who wait until the beginning of the session to bring up a point are often not heard.  Simply put, nonprofit lobbyists have to compete with big business.  Presenting concise, clear talking points to a representative early on is only part of the battle.  Attending committee and taskforce meetings is a must.  Assume that a legislator will only listen to his or her constituents, so go out and find people to stand up for the issue within the legislator’s district.  

Delegate McClellan also asserted the importance of “just stick[ing] with it,” as she cited the long sought after 2008 payday lending legislation as an example.  “Never underestimate the power of a letter or a phone call,” advises McClellan.  To learn more about your legislators, visit the General Assembly website.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Bat Signal out for Wronged Consumers

Harmful lending practices on the part of certain car title lenders and internet payday lenders have fueled an outreach effort from the Virginia Poverty Law Center (VPLC) designed to increase awareness of illegal lending. Car title lending, an industry that came under regulation on October 1st, 2010, requires Virginia lenders to be licensed.  Despite this implementation, only 7 out of the 23 car title lenders in Virginia had obtained licenses by October 1st.  The VPLC has received calls through its Predatory Lending Hotline from borrowers of illegal loans.  These consumers had taken out loans from unlicensed car title lenders after October 1st, and although the loans are illegal and unenforceable, borrowers are still being hounded to pay back these illegal loans.  The VPLC has also received calls from victims of internet loans, which are illegal in Virginia.  VPLC interns have hit the streets armed with flyers and information as part of an outreach campaign designed to promote the hotline to those who have received an illegal internet loan or a potentially illegal car title loan.





Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Consumer Outreach

VPLC interns have hit the streets to spread the word about predatory lending. The interns have formed connections in the community with local libraries, local businesses and community organizations such as Hill Top Promises. As part of an ongoing project, the VPLC interns will keep you updated on their outreach efforts.

Baby Steps...

Dallas’ City Council has gone to bat for consumers against payday lenders in a unanimous decision to pass regulations aimed to help consumers pay off the debt from these predatory loans.  The City Council has acted in response to a lack of legislation from the state level.  Dallas City Councilman, Jerry Allen, said in an NBC DFW report about the new city regulations that “this is as strong a teeth that we can put into this and it sends a message that we will not tolerate our citizens bring taken advantage of.”   

Virginians can easily relate to Allen’s concern that the state is not doing enough to protect consumers.  On the 23rd of June, The Virginian-Pilot blasted the state legislature for ignoring the wants of its constituents.  Despite calls for regulation of predatory lenders from the Federal Government, Consumer Advocates, and borrowers, the number of predatory lending locations in Virginia has increased dramatically since the end of 2010.  The Virginian-Pilot seems to think it might have something to do with political contributions on the state level in excess of $200,000.   

Texans and Virginians can still stay optimistic, as the Attorney General of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, filed a suit against an internet payday lender based in Kansas.  The suit comes after successful efforts to eliminate “usurious storefront payday lending in [Arkansas,]” as McDaniel put it in an article on the Arkansas Attorney General's website.

America’s Nastiest Lender

I see a new reality show here: Predatory lender survival
Put them on an island with no food so they have to eat each other.
America’s Nastiest Lender
These two men helped create the payday loan business that preys on the poorest Americans. Gary Rivlin on the outrageous lives and businesses of Jared Davis and Allan Jones.
by Gary Rivlin | June 25, 2011 11:57 AM EDT
Jared Davis or Allan Jones?

I think about some of the more odious characters I met in my two years hanging out on America’s subprime fringes and those two would be my finalists.

If forced to choose between them, I’d give the nod to Jones as the most repellant of them all. But in doing so I know I might well be short-changing Davis.
After all, I spent two days with Jones, listening to him rationalize a business, Check Into Cash, that earns him 400 percent or more interest on loans to those who can least afford it. We spent hours together locked in a car as Jones gave me a driving tour of his life and expounded on race and other issues. We shared a couple of meals, he showed me the house he built for himself modeled on the famous 250-room Biltmore mansion. His version includes two elevators, a pair of man-made lakes, and a regulation-sized football field complete with light, bleachers, and field house. We hung out at a bar as Jones sipped on what he calls a “Scotch slurpee” (the expensive single malt he has a bartender pour over shaved ice in the plastic cup they keep for him behind the bar) and he and his friends told jokes that landed with a thud on the wrong side of propriety.
Nikki Fox / Daily News-Record / AP Photo
Mainly, though, I listened to Jones complain. He’s clearing $20 million a year post-taxes making loans to hotel housekeepers, home health care workers, and others barely getting by each month. He owns two private jets and when the 136-foot yacht he bought from the king of Spain burned in a fire, he replaced it with a 157-foot vessel that Yachting magazine described as having “an abundance of exquisite and highly detailed woodwork… and 10 big-screen TVs.” But for a good portion of the 14 hours we spent together I endured his belly-aching about how much more he’d be making if he didn’t have to contend with the pointy-headed liberals and other critics who want to put a cap on how much he could charge.
Jared Davis could be just as sour as Jones and equally as greedy. He, too, pulls in around $20 million a year making loans of $300 or $400 or $500 a year to the working poor but he had brought his brother into the business and it was his father’s money that had gotten him started. He needed to share his spoils. “I don’t consider myself wealthy,” he tells me.
Davis is huge, a pear-shaped man who stands around 6 foot 5 inches tall. A “big old goofy-looking dude who always needs a shave” is the way Allan Jones describes him. There were photos around his office of him shaking hands with George W. Bush and John McCain and behind his desk hung stylish black-and-whites of his young children blown up so large that they were distracting. I watched the YouTube videos made by former Davis employees who felt horrible about how they made their money (“I resigned because I could no longer stomach the lies, and I could no longer continue exploiting customers, making hard lives even harder,” one said), I had spent the better part of a day with a former store manager who had saved some of the crass directives she had received from management (lend “to anyone getting social security,” one read, even if a customer only had “one dime to their name”). I’m sure I wou ld have found Jared Davis similarly loathsome if our time together had not been so limited. I only got to spend two hours with him before I was shown the door—barely enough time to even get into the lawsuit his father has filed against his two sons charging them with bilking him out of money.
It was Davis who followed Jones into the cash advance business. So Jones gets extra points on the loathsomeness scale for giving the country the payday loan industry. Jones was making good money as a small-town debt collector when he got the bright idea of selling fast and easy two-week loans to all those janitors and warehouse workers and mall clerks forever falling short of cash before the end of the month. He’d charge $20 for every $100 borrowed and he’d let you pay another $20 per $100 if you couldn’t pay him back in full in two weeks. At those rates, he was making more than 500 percent interest on his money. But what choice did people have when a bounced check would end up costing them more?
Jones opened his first payday store in 1993 in his hometown of Cleveland, Tennessee. By 2006, payday was a $40-billion-a-year industry with more storefronts scattered around the country than McDonalds and Burger Kings combined.
(And these stores are about as healthy for you, financially speaking, as a weekend spent binging on Big Macs: each year around 2 million customers end up owing a payday loan for most of the year, meaning the same $500 loan ends up costing them $2,000 in fees.)
That’s how Jones saw it. “You’re comparing me with Jared Davis and them all at Check ‘n Go?” he asked me incredulously. “There’s things they’ve done over there,” Jones said, sounding genuinely offended, “that we’d never do here.”
Jared Davis was a 26-year-old rich kid from Cincinnati casting about for something to do when he learned about the payday loan business. Only 14 months had passed since Jones opened that first store so the entire country was still up for grabs. Davis’ father was the CEO and president of Provident Bank, Cincinnati’s second largest. He didn’t need much convincing about the wisdom of investing in his son’s startup. You’d just have to open a store and a few months later you’d recoup your investment costs. Then you’d start clearing profits of 50 percent.
Broke, USA: From Pawnshops to Poverty, Inc.—How the Working Poor Became Big Business By Gary Rivlin. 368 pages. HarperCollins. $15.99.
If nothing else, Jones and Davis had good timing. At the start of the 1990s, the price of everything from housing to heating oil to health care was going up while the wages of the bottom half were stagnating. For those living on the economic margins, a stop at the local payday store offered an easy solution they could squeeze in between work and picking up the kids.
“Loaning people small amounts of money against their next paycheck?” Davis told me. “I liked the business. I liked it a lot.”
Davis had lawyers on retainer researching state laws to find where they might legally make these high-priced loans (loan sharks, after all, typically charge about 150 percent interest and loan sharking is illegal). So, too, did Jones. Both employed small legions of lobbyists, both gave liberally to elected officials in the hopes they’d support legislation that allowed them to operate legally in that state.
“It got unbelievably competitive,” Jared Davis said. “It was literally a race from space to space.” Eventually both Jones and the Davises opened around 1,300 stores each. A loan shark I met with in Cleveland, Tennessee whistled with admiration over what Jones, who he has known since they were both young, had pulled off. He had taken the loan shark’s basic business model and gone national with it, making hundreds of millions of dollars in the process. Jones didn’t have his people breaking kneecaps (instead they’d harass you and your references with daily phone calls if you were late) but then he was also charging more than twice the rate.
“The thing about the poor people’s economy,” the loan shark told me, “is that basically it’s recession proof. You’re always going to have people who need $100 or $200 real quick.”
Jones added points on the odious scale while driving me around town and sharing his views on race. His town has just enough blacks to put together a decent basketball team and win some football games, he told me—but not so many that the good people of Cleveland, Tennessee need to worry about crime.
“That's why I can leave my keys in the car with the door unlocked,” he explained. Every Thursday afternoon, a former Jones employee told me, the big boss and his top executives pad around the office in their socks. Why? That’s when a black man named Randy, whom Jones and his cronies call the “Little Chocolate Man,” comes to shine their shoes.

On the other hand, race might be one of those topics that underscores that maybe I’m shortchanging Davis by relegating him to second place. A district director who used to work for him called a press conference a few years back to talk about the company’s methods for choosing new store locations. “I have been responsible for selecting sites for new stores in D.C. and northern Virginia,” he said—and to those who claim the company doesn’t target minority communities, “I can tell you emphatically that it does.”
When I asked Davis about his former employee’s claim, he impugned the man’s character and denied his charges. Then he acknowledged that the former employee might have been speaking the truth.
“Do we go after the minority customer?” Davis asked. “In D.C., you’re right, that’s all that live there. We go after that population. If it’s a Mexican population, we go after Mexicans. If it’s a white population, it’s whites we go after.”
Jones doesn’t seem well liked in his hometown. He’s crass, a local businessman offered. Another business owner told me the story of a delivery person he knows whom Jones tried to get fired because apparently he didn’t think she had shown him enough deference. “He lords himself over everyone,” a teacher who has known him since grade school confided in me. He gives the school the smallest donation, she said, and still adds strings to his gift: “Basically, he gives money to the school for wrestling and nothing else.” A few years back, Jones planted some trees in the town plaza– and now there’s a granite marker in the town square that tells passersby that W. A. ‘Allan’ Jones, Jr. dedicates these trees to all the citizens of the local county.
That’s Jones, a woman has known him since they were both children tells me. “He does one little thing and he has to build a marble statue in his honor,” she said, adding, “He was a prick then, he’s a prick now.” That seems the general consensus at a website called RateYourBoss.com, where entry after entry describes Jones as precisely the kind of chief executive for whom you would never want to work. “He constantly berates people, makes people cry, and bullies them,” one post reads. “He is horrible!”
Yet maybe Jared Davis deserves the nod after all. In my two years exploring the subprime fringes, I spent time with the founders of most of the country’s biggest payday lending companies. I spoke with entrepreneurs behind some of the smaller chains that must compete with the big boys. Hands down Check ‘n Go was the consensus choice for the payday chain that exhibited the least scruples.
That’s how Jones saw it. “You’re comparing me with Jared Davis and them all at Check ‘n Go?” he asked me incredulously during our second day together. “There’s things they’ve done over there,” Jones said, sounding genuinely offended, “that we’d never do here.”

Saturday, June 25, 2011

CFPB: Fighting for Consumer Protection

Where is the line between infringement of rights and consumer protection?  Starting July 1st 2011, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will begin to protect American consumer interests against the predatory practices of certain financial products.  The President and CEO of the Consumers Union, Jim Guest, claims that regardless of political leaning, protections from “unfair, deceptive, or abusive financial products” are needed to discourage the promotion of business models that knowingly endanger the assets and well being of consumers across America.  The federal watchdog has received heavy preemptive criticism from “detractors…labeling the bureau anti-bank, anti-growth, and anti-American.”  Consumers Union’s intent is to continue to provide to consumers “transparency, truth-in-labeling, and safety measures for everything from canned peas to cars.”  Consumer Reports, March 2011        

The CFPB has clearly outlined its goals to stop credit card companies from over-charging for late and repeat late fees, encourage credit card companies to standardize protection services regardless of method of payment, require bureaus to fix mistakes that they have made, and protect consumers from mandatory arbitration and emerging scams.  How can you help in the fight for consumer protection and increased transparency?  Talk about it.  Tell your neighbors that that the CFPB is on its way to fight against harmful financial products.  Starting July 1st, the CFPB will have to put its money where its mouth is.  Help give it a voice. 

To find more information about Consumers Union, please visit www.defendyourdollars.org

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Debt Collectors Ask for R-E-S-P-E-C-T

The New York Times recently ran an article discussing how debt collectors feel they are getting a bad rap and often face abuse by consumers. Consumers, however, may relate a little better with Aretha's signature lyric "sock it to me, sock it to me, sock it to me." Take a look at some of the 237 comments left by readers and it becomes apparent that consumers are continuing to feel harassed by debt collectors. There has been a 17% increase in the number of complaints filed against debt collectors and yet the Association of Credit and Collection Professionals (ACA International) is lobbying for more invasive means of contacting consumers that include allowing the use of cell phones, email, texting and autodialers for collection purposes (ACA "Blueprint at a Glance"). You can view the New York Times article by clicking here.

The Ugly Side of Car Title Loans

June 20th article by Tom Shean of The Virginian-Pilot explains the situation of Travis Wood, a twenty year old man who took out a cart title loan to help his girlfriend pay her rent.  Travis’ story raises questions like, are car title lenders properly regulated?  Is it fair to offer a financial product that causes so many people to default on their loans?  Is there a better way to help and protect Virginians who are in a financial bind?

The debate over whether or not certain types of financial services should be regulated is an ideological one.  Some are likely to blame Wood, while others are calling for stricter legislation limiting predatory lending practices.  Either way, this article provides a great example for why financial education should be stressed in high schools across Virginia.  Teaching students to read and understand the conditions of a financial agreement will allow for many more Virginians to make better decisions in regards to alternative financial services. 

New Data on Patrons of Alternative Financial Services in Virginia

On June 14th, an NBC 29 News Report from Charlottesville explained that new data from the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service at the University of Virginia shows that 10% of Virginia families take out short term loans.   According to UVA demographer, Rebecca Tippett, Virginia is one of the most open states in terms of alternative financial services in the United States.  Typically, young unmarried parents take out these loans in order to provide for their families.  Often, these borrowers are employed, and in the case of car-title loans, borrowers are risking their livelihoods by putting up their methods of transportation as collateral.  It is to be noted that Virginia is in the minority, as it has yet to eliminate car-title loans.  Click here to view the transcript of the report from NBC WVIR-TV. 

Encouraging Responsible Lending

The Virginia Partnership to Encourage Responsible Lending (VaPERL) is in the business of protecting consumers.  Borrowers across Virginia have suffered from loans from payday lenders and car title lenders, which were unregulated before 2002 in Virginia.  The “Payday Loan Act” of 2002, passed by the General Assembly, instituted reforms that required all payday lenders to be licensed, submit annual reports, and abide by a limit on application fees.  Public advocates against predatory lending continue to fight for reforms as low income Virginians continue to be trapped in a cycle of poverty.  According to VaPERL, most payday lenders rely on their customers to take out 7 to 8 loans a year.  With lenders targeting repeat borrowers and applying annual interest rates that averaged nearly 300 percent, VaPERL led a campaign to reduce the annualized loan rates to 36 percent.  After 57 localities in Virginia supported the 36% cap, the 2008 General Assembly passed legislation that would lower the interest rate cap to 36 percent.  However, due to intense lobbying from the payday lending sector, loan fees were not included in the cap, allowing lenders to once again offer rates that approached the annualized loan rate of 300 percent.